Sunday, December 14, 2008
I am one... Letter from Zimbabwe
This is from the newsletter of Manon of Tractor Tractor. If you have never heard of Tractor Tractor then visit the site and read something of the concept of her long journey from Amsterdam to the South Pole on her little green tractor... It's wonderful and wonderfully crazy - in sad contrast to the letter below. Please read it.
Friday, December 05, 2008
Down in the dump: a visit to Kathmandu's rubbish hole
Yesterday I visited Sisdole where Katmandu's rapidly filling rubbish dump is located. It is what you might expecte of a rubbish dump: a lot of rubbish, a sickly smell, pipes ventilating gases from putrefaction, trucks delivering more booty at regular intervals, bulldozers flattening it out across the dump. The setting was a bit incongruous: all this among green wooded hillsides and terraced fields. What certainly was not be expected was the 25 or so men, women and children walking around on top of it trying to supplement their income from the recyclable waste they could recover.
It was quite depressing. I walked around for some 20 minutes, feeling a little uncomfortable, taking some pictures and talking to people. They seemed resigned to the disgusting work at hand, slightly cheery in a ke garne (what-to-do) kind of way. But not happy.
Apparently 350 tones of waste is produced by Kathmandu daily. That results in around 50 trucks travelling the uphill then downhill 28km from the city to this rural area. 65% of the waste is organic meaning it could be either composted or used to produce biogas. That is, if it were separated at source.
As new trucks came and reversed down to the site, people waited to attack the new load before it was flattened out. Out of one truck came two fluorescent lighting tubes which a boy picked out, waved around and then promptly smashed, releasing their mercury containing powder into the air.
So what to do? What is the problem. If the problem is my being disgusted at people having to do this to earn or supplement an income, then perhaps I should be banned from going there. If it is because this work is hazardous - god knows what awful stuff finds itself among this waste - then perhaps these people should be banned from approaching the site.
Longer term, it makes sense to separate waste. Actually no, in the short term it makes sense, now. Here are the reasons:
- Of the 65% organic fraction of the 350 tonnes per day, if it could be used in biogas digesters, then ____ Rp of gas could be produced. (figure to come)
- If all of that could be sold as compost (unlikely), then its sales value could be up to 3,60,000 Rp (3,600 Eur)
- Reducing the truck journeys from 50 to 18 would save around 1,50,000 per day (1,500 Eur).
- Removing the organic fraction from the waste makes obtaining the recyclable elements much easier and slightly less unpleasant (if no less dangerous).
- Once some separation is started, it makes it easier to begin to separate the non-organic fraction into useful and non-useful elements.
Uneven load shedding
This appeared today in the letters ot the editor section of the Kathmandu Post.
No load shedding We understand that the demand for electricity exceeds the supply and that the NEA has to resort to load shedding [the enforced shutting down of sections of the power grid to share out limited electricity supply]. The hours of darkness are getting longer. However, one wonders why some places never have load shedding even when the whole city is without electricity. A huge area near our house in Lazimpat never has load shedding. This is not fair! If it were a public facility like a hospital, we would understand. But it's just another private house. Why this discrimination? Rajendra Khadga LazimpatWell, I am embarrassed to admit that I am one of those living in an area with 24/7 power supply. I am no wiser than Rajendra as to the reason, although there was talk of one of the houses nearby once being inhabited by a VIP. Of course it is as unfair as it is wonderful for me. Load shedding is a great hinderance to the citizens of the city. Moving along unlit streets is plain dangerous. Trying to study or read by candle light is no easy task. The prominant industrialist Binod Chaudary noted this as one of the concerns of the business community while this government is apparently aiming for double digit economic growth. While I could turn the power off at the appointed times, I don't think I will. I will promise however to limit myself to one light at a time and power to the internet connection and laptop until this area joins the rest of suffering citizens. Saying this, there is a lot of work to be done here in terms of energy efficiency. More about this another time - when I have done something about it.
A small act of censorship at a Human Rights photography exhibition
The piece of card was about just 8cm by 6cm crudely stuck down with tape but big enough to make quite a mess of the UDHR60 photographic exhibition being hosted by the Russian Cultural Centre (RCC) in Kathmandu, Nepal.
On December 10th the world will celebrate the 60th anniversary of the Declaration of Human Rights. As this declaration was signed in Paris in 1948, the Alliance Française took the lead in developing a week long program of film and documentary screenings. The screenings were supported by a photographic exhibition created by the renowned VII Network, a photographic agency which comprises some of the worlds best contemporary photo journalists.
To quote the VII website:
“A total of 30 photos were chosen that best represent the 30 articles, or principles, contained in the Declaration of Human Rights. The images come from the VII and VII Network photographers - photographers who risk their lives on an almost daily basis to bear witness to the world's injustices and to document human rights abuses. That fight will continue.”
And the photographs are as tragic as they are excellent. Disappointingly, in complete contradiction to the spirit of the event and the content of declaration itself, the RCC, using this small piece of card and tape, carried out an act censorship.
The photo in question was taken in 2000 by Eric Bouvet to represent Article 9: “No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.” The picture was captioned (in French) with: “A young Chechen female is imprisoned in the Russian Chernokozovo detention centre in the suburbs of Grozny, Chechnya in 2000.” Presumably feeling that this might show Russia in a bad light, the caption was censored by covering it up.
Article 19 says: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.” Hopefully this too should apply to Eric Bouvet?
According to a source at the Alliance Française, it was indeed felt by the Russian Cultural Centre that this picture might single out Russia negatively and that “there are no pictures of Guantanamo bay” for instance. Alliance Française offered to remove the picture completely from the exhibition but this was rejected in favour of covering up the caption.
On Friday at 2pm the picture was removed completely. At 4pm, as the exhibition was being packed away, it had been returned with caption intact.
Dr Vladimir Novikov the Russian Cultural Centre's amiable director said it was "a question of balance." He would have been happier if only one picture had been used per country and in the exhibition, Chechnya was featured twice. According to him it was the Alliance Française who covered the caption. According to Alliance Française, it was the RCS that requested that to be done (though this is not about appointing blame).
Many countries are depicted in the exhibition and a few are shown in a bad light, namely: Burma, Brazil, China, USA on tour in Iraq (3 pictures) and also this country, Nepal (a picture of a 15 year old crying as her wedding procession leads her to her new husband's home in Kagati Village).
The argument that the picture singles out Russia is a poor one. But still it is completely missing the point.
There are few countries in the world with a clean human rights record. The object of the exhibition is not about specific finger pointing. It is to remind us that we, the 'human family' as the French government aniversary website describes us, have a long way to go, that we need to re-read and keep these declarations in mind at all times and, most importantly, that we need to challenge contraventions, however small, wherever we find them.
The irony is that the presence of this captioned photograph in the exhibition didn’t reflect any more badly on Russia than the many other countries depicted or we the 'human family' in general. The fact that the RCC engaged in this small act of censorship, at such an exhibition, really does.
http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/fr/IMG/online/intro.swf
http://www.viiphoto.com/showstory.php?nID=790
http://www.russiancultureinnepal.org/russian/en/
http://www.alliancefrancaise.org.np/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Recent posts
Kathmandu Kathmandu Google Group
Disclaimer: No part of this website or any part of the content, copy and images may be reproduced or re-distributed in any format without the prior approval of its owner. thehalfhog.com is very happy to permit widespread use of its intellectual property but permission must be gained in advance. To get permission, please